I guess.. I mean why would it be that way instead?
The highlight of the saying is on “profoundness” and points to the notion that though profoundness is pretty cool that Truth is even greater and in fact more profound.. I think. Anyway I thought it pretty profound and Yet True so thats cool.
Because it’s a less than and greater than sign and since truth is greater I should it should be first. But I guess it is a true statement either way.š¤·āāļø
I’m not understanding where the should is coming from still. Truth is greater. but the original post was that Profoundness is less than Truth. The focus being on profoundness is what maintains the necessity for it to be first. I think. because the statement is not about truth it is about profoundness and its relationship to truth. Hopefully it is true though cause if not I want to change it to what is true.
Or should it be “Truth > profoundness” ?
I guess.. I mean why would it be that way instead?
The highlight of the saying is on “profoundness” and points to the notion that though profoundness is pretty cool that Truth is even greater and in fact more profound.. I think. Anyway I thought it pretty profound and Yet True so thats cool.
Because it’s a less than and greater than sign and since truth is greater I should it should be first. But I guess it is a true statement either way.š¤·āāļø
I’m not understanding where the should is coming from still. Truth is greater. but the original post was that Profoundness is less than Truth. The focus being on profoundness is what maintains the necessity for it to be first. I think. because the statement is not about truth it is about profoundness and its relationship to truth. Hopefully it is true though cause if not I want to change it to what is true.